• News
  • Maps
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Contact
Discovery
MORE
Dark mode
Type size
Follow us
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Português
  • Spanish
  • English
Skip to content
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • PT
  • ES
  • EN
InfoAmazonia

InfoAmazonia

What are you looking for?
  • News
  • Maps
  • Projects
  • About us
    • Contact
Discovery

Peruvian government affirms illegal plantation activity in Amazon rainforest

What are you looking for?
Página inicial » Topics » Deforestation » Peruvian government affirms illegal plantation activity in Amazon rainforest
Posted in

Peruvian government affirms illegal plantation activity in Amazon rainforest

Mongabay
14 June 2016 at 7:00 (Updated on 14 September 2020 at 12:04)

Peru’s forest authority has issued a statement to the London Stock Exchange condemning United Cacao’s plantation projects.

Yesterday, Peru’s forest authority issued a public statement confirming illegal actions on the part of United Cacao and called on the London Stock Exchange to hold the company accountable for its alleged violations. The statement is the latest in a series of escalating exchanges between United Cacao and its critics.United Cacao is a Cayman Islands-based, UK-listed agroindustry company with roots in Southeast Asia and holdings in Peru. Managed by subsidiary companies, its Peruvian palm oil and cacao plantations have attracted significant criticism from conservation and human rights organizations, which say they have displaced indigenous territory and primary forest.The company is listed on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM), a subset of the London Stock Exchange (LSE). On May 4, a letter issued by more than 60 Peruvian and international organizations was sent to the LSE urging that it remove United Cacao from trading on the AIM, citing violations of AIM legality regulations.“The Peruvian government initiated legal action against the United Cacao’s Peruvian subsidiary, Cacao del Peru Norte, as early as 2013, prior to the company’s initial public offering in December 2014,” the letter reads. “United Cacao’s Admission Document misrepresented the extent to which legal rulings in Peru favored the company at that time, as did subsequent statements to investors, in violation of AIM rules.”

United Cacao's major projects in Peru include a cacao plantation in the north and two palm oil plantations in the midsection of the country. Tree cover loss shown from 2010 through 2014; image courtesy of Global Forest Watch.
United Cacao’s major projects in Peru include a cacao plantation in the north and two palm oil plantations in the midsection of the country. Tree cover loss shown occurred from 2010 through 2014; plantation insets not to scale. Image courtesy of Global Forest Watch.

 

On May 5, United Cacao issued a response statement, refuting allegations that its plantation operations in Peru are illegal.

“The Company operates in full compliance with all applicable Peruvian and environmental laws relating to planning, land use, development, operation and plantation standards,” the statement reads. “It operates on freehold land zoned for agricultural purposes by the relevant government authorities of Loreto, Peru.”

In its statement published on the LSE website, United Cacao asserts its documentation that assesses a project’s environmental and community impacts – called a PAMA – had been approved in 2013 by “the relevant authorities,” and that the company is expecting final approval later this year.

But one subset of those “relevant authorities” has come out against the company. On May 24, the Peruvian government’s forest authority (SERFOR) released a statement condemning United Cacao. The statement asserts that it did not have the required environmental approval and has indeed illegally cleared large areas of rainforest to develop its plantations, as verified by Peru’s Ministry of Agriculture (DGAAA).

A translated version of SERFOR’s statement outlines government actions to halt the operations of United Cacao’s subsidiaries in Peru. This includes a 2014 stop work order on a massive cacao plantation the size of more than 3,000 soccer fields carved out of what researchers say was primary rainforest in the country’s northeast. The order came after an evaluation by the DGAAA found the plantation’s development posed a high risk of serious harm to the environment. SERFOR asserts the plantation did not follow legally required procedure and lacked DGAAA environmental certification.

However, satellite imagery and interviews with local community members indicate forest clearing continued on the cacao plantation despite the injunction.

Peru is considered the fourth most biodiverse county in the world, with the majority of its wildlife found in its rainforests. Photo taken in Tambopata National Reserve by Rhett A. Butler.
Peru is considered the fourth most biodiverse county in the world, with the majority of its wildlife found in its rainforests. Photo taken in Tambopata National Reserve by Rhett A. Butler.

 

Moreover, SERFOR asserts that the PAMA United Cacao had been using to justify the legality of its operations was not approved by the DGAAA and is not in accordance with proper procedure.

SERFOR’s statement ends by urging the London Stock Exchange to support the position of the Peruvian government by ensuring their listed companies meet trading legality requirements.

The move was lauded by the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), a NGO that has been tracking the issues surrounding United Cacao’s plantations in Peru.

“We commend SERFOR’s and DGAAA’s ongoing efforts to stop illegal and destructive deforestation for agricultural commodities,” EIA’s Julia Urrunaga said in a statement. “The Peruvian government has repeatedly documented that [United Cacao’s subsidiary] Cacao del Peru Norte’s operations are illegal and have caused significant damage to Peruvian forests.

“The Peruvian government has made it clear that the London Stock Exchange and other sources of international capital have a role to play in ending abuses and deforestation in Peru.”

– This report was originally published in Mongabay and is republished by an agreement to share content.

Tagged: Amazon Rainforest, deforestation, environmental impact assessment, illegal, legal, PAMA, peru, united cacao
There are no comments yet. Leave a comment!

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Deforestation in the Amazon: past, present and future

March 21, 2023

According to a new study from RAISG, in just five years, the Amazon could lose almost half of what it lost in the past two decades.

Researchers call for an international boycott of products linked to deforestation in the Amazon

January 21, 2022

Blocks such as the European Union should expand restrictions on purchases associated with deforestation and other impacts in tropical countries.

Saweto's daughter, from Peru, persists in her fight for justice

October 20, 2020

Diana Ríos Rengifo took on the defense of the Peruvian Amazon after the murder of her father, a well-known Asheninka leader in the fight against illegal loggers. The trees in Saweto, a community located near the Peruvian border with Brazil, are highly coveted on the market and are threatened by indiscriminate logging.

  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube

CONTENT

  • News
  • Maps
  • Projects

INSTITUTIONAL

  • About us
  • Contact

OTHERS

  • Portuguese (Português)
  • Spanish (Español)

Web development by

Hacklab /